22 Jan 2015

Zimbabwe gives white farmers 90 days to vacate farms in latest land grabs.

White former farmers should be given 90 days to vacate their farms if the land they occupy has been allocated to a black person to avoid legal battles, the Zimbabwean government has reportedly said.
According to the News Day, Land and Rural Resettlement Minister Douglas Mombeshora said government would not allow contract farming arrangements where the indigenous farm owners would get only 10% of total produce while their white partners grabbed the lion’s share.
Only white farmers specialising in dairy and cattle breeding or those who openly support the ruling Zanu-PF party would be spared, a Daily News report added.
This comes a few days after Vice PresidentEmmerson Mnangagwa said Zimbabwe was set to intensify its land grabs, targeting the country’s remaining white farmers and those with multi farms.

Land grab policy
Opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) warned on Monday of "more chaos" on white and former white-owned farms.
MDC spokesperson Obert Gutu said the intensification of the land grab policy would not benefit the ordinary Zimbabwean but the well-heeled and the politically connected.   
President Robert Mugabe and his Zanu-PF party launched the land reforms in 2000, taking over white-owned farms to resettle landless blacks.
Mugabe said the reforms were meant to correct colonial land ownership imbalances.

Clashes with veterans
At least 4 000 white commercial farmers were evicted from their farms.
The land seizures were often violent, claiming the lives of several white farmers during clashes with veterans of Zimbabwe's 1970s liberation struggle.
Mugabe made headlines last year when he vowed that whites would never be allowed to own land in Zimbabwe.
Mugabe at the time also warned black Zimbabweans against partnering with whites in agriculture deals.

22 comments:

  1. I'm curious, How did these White Farmers obtain this Land in the first place? Are the Original Occupants now wanting it back? That would seem to be the case, if history has a say here. Live by the Sword, die by the Sword, right?

    ReplyDelete
  2. So you believe in collective punishment? Wow. Punish innocent people for the alleged deeds of their ancestors? That's not a very original brand of totalitarian racism you have adopted there, cold.

    ReplyDelete
  3. So taking and keeping said stolen property isn't "collective punishment" of the Original Victims? Pointy Hat obstructing your vision?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Like I said, you believe in punishing people for the alleged crimes of their parents. Think about that before you accuse me of anything.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The ancestors of the Original Victims are STILL ALIVE. So give it back, they want a place to live. Or should they settle for Reservations?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I know you probably don't care about things like rationality, logic and reason, but what you are doing here is called the Tu quoque fallacy, or fallacy from hypocrisy. From wikipedia: "the appeal to hypocrisy is an informal logical fallacy that intends to discredit the opponent's position by asserting the opponent's failure to act consistently in accordance with that position. It attempts to show that a criticism or objection applies equally to the person making it. This attempts to dismiss opponent's position based on criticism of the opponent's inconsistency and not the position presented.[2] It is a special case of ad hominem fallacy,"


    I am accusing you of believing in collective punishment - a recognized war crime. And you do not deny that you believe in collective punishment, you simply say, "but the other people were collectively punished too, so its OK. 2 Wrong make a it right." But it doesn't matter cold, because 2 wrongs don't make a right! Which is exactly what you are arguing! You believe in collective punishment, that means you believe in CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, I condemn the people who stole that land in the first place. Now I'd like you hear you condemn the people who are trying to steal it now - and RACE DOESN'T MATTER! It doesn't matter if the people are white, they is no reason is dispossess them. I'm done explaining how you are an ignorant, genocidal bigot.

    ReplyDelete
  7. My reply is VERY RATIONAL. Turn about in this situation would clearly be fair play.

    ReplyDelete
  8. You're a delusional and brainwashed SJW - rationality is a positive evil in your universe.

    ReplyDelete
  9. No, giving back to the rightful inhabitants is very rational. They seem to have some prior standing in regard to tenancy. Until their land was stolen/taken from them. Remember, Whites came back to Africa to "save the savages" from themselves. Through savagery themselves.
    Oh, and to put those lazy Negroes to work in the Caribbean and US of A! Because, how could they do this hard work themselves!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Way back in history the blacks in Africa killed the white farmers who stayed.( this is not racist) They celebrated and the farms went unused and there were more hungry. unicef come help.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Land grab?
    Are the Black people stealing land that is not theirs as the White man did in America, Canada, Australia and New Zealand for example?
    Or as the Khazars did in Palestine?

    ReplyDelete
  12. These are not ALLEGED crimes.

    ReplyDelete
  13. That's what the noble Yankee did.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Mr Pound, how would you propose the situation be settled.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Sooria, you bring up the obvious point that no one wishes to acknowledge: all land has been "stolen" from someone at one point in time or another. Incidentally, any rational socialist cannot criticize the colonization of North America and dispossession of the Native Americans because the #1 tenet of socialism is that a minority (e.g., the wealthy) does not have a right to monopolize resources that the majority needs to survive. And since socialism does not believe in national borders, Europeans had just as much right to access the resources of North America as the Natives did. Therefore, the Natives had no intrinsic right to summarily and selfishly monopolize the capital and resources of North America to the detriment of their Europeans fellow-men who were in such desperate need of those resources. Right?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Who says its for me (or you or anyone else) to settle? It is for the Zimbabweans themselves - white and black - to settle. If the result is the wholesale extermination of whites, which almost always happens when whites become a minority among non-whites, so be it. This would only go to prove and reinforce the opinion among many white people that Africans and other blacks are as uncivilized and barbaric as ever.

    ReplyDelete
  17. "the noble Yankee" To whom does this refer? White people?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Please post your links to instances where Blacks have exterminated whites. If you cannot find any maybe you can outline such an instance.

    I have a history room full of genocide committed by white on people of ALL colors, but for the life of me I cant immediately think of an instant of black genocide on white. I am currently searching through archives to find this. The last 1000 years is my search parameter.

    It sounds like YOU have this information.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I guess you've never heard of the island nation of Haiti where the black majority there decided one day in 1791 to murder every white person on the island - about 10,000. The reason you don't know about genocides perpetrated against whites is because you are a biased bigot that only reads things that confirm his anti-white prejudices. There is current a white genocide going in South Africa RIGHT NOW where the "president" of that black-made hell hole openly sings "Kill the boer (white man)" on national television.

    ReplyDelete
  20. ‘Before the fighting ended 100,000 of the 500,000
    blacks and 24,000 of the 40,000 whites were killed.'

    What you left out of your demonic representation of truth (demons have a natural aversion to and
    a natural ability to turn a truth into a lie) is that the blacks were slaves of the whites who treated them in the most inhuman manner and if you were a slave
    you would have been obligated as a human being to be free yourself by any means necessary.

    ‘The Haitian Revolution (1791–1804) was a slave revolt in the French colony of Saint-Domingue,
    which culminated in the elimination of slavery there and the founding of the Republic of Haiti’

    Fast forward to the 21st Century and Blacks are still having to cast off white oppression. If it were not for the likes of Robert Mugabe, Zimbabwe would still be Rhodesia and Blacks would be living under the brutal white dictatorship that utilized the same genocide the
    Zionists use against the Palestinians on a daily basis and then the occasional mowing of the lawn.


    Humanity is gonna chase you crazy demons out of town whether you are white, pink, purple or black.

    It hurts me every time a demon identifies him/herself as a demon. Their hands type wobbly nonsense and their heads dangle loosely, basically their gait is identifiable as being led by a false spirit

    Demon Hunting is a satisfying but dangerous sport.
    Boo I got you bagged...Dipshit

    ReplyDelete
  21. Right and therefore the majority blacks in Haiti who you disgustingly lied about them genociding whites had the moral duty as socialists to take control of the resources of the island for the greater good of the majority, just as Mugabe is doing in Zimbabwe. Mugabe also has the additional moral right as the original owner of the land. Cecil Rhodes was a mere demonic passer by who decided to violently squat in other peoples property.



    You are a sorry excuse for a demon trying to parade as an intellectual

    ReplyDelete
  22. Under natural law, thieves never prosper and thus whites who achieved their status on the back of their ancestors misdeeds will likewise lose what they gained in the same unholy manner.

    Now if Maggie Thatcher has paid the whites what she agreed to in discussions with the Majority, imagine what they could have done with that money in their pockets.

    I assume you are of the persuasion that whites are exceptional compared to all others ESPECIALLY barbarian blacks. Then with all that money they could have bought up Zimbabwe as Zimbabwean citizens and contributed to and enjoy the great benefits of Zimbabwe today.

    Mr Pound. your type of verbal fogginess couched in all those fancy words is the type of propaganda I have identified as demon talk.

    Therefore as a demon hunter let me explain the rules. Once you come out as a demon you are going to get caught up in my net of truth. That is the weapon I choose to use on you.. Others may use a sword delivered into your consciousness via their keyboard.

    We are fishers of men and invite you into our heaven, you have your own space; step up and occupy or face the wrath of stronger elements

    ReplyDelete