29 Jan 2015

New study suggests Right-to-Work Law is doing more harm than good

As support for right-to-work laws seems to be dwindling in the state Legislature, a study by the Economic Policy Institute has found that states enforcing the laws have lower standards of living in comparison to Wisconsin.
The study compared different economic factors such as household income, median hourly wage and poverty rate, among others between Wisconsin and right-to-work states. Household income in Wisconsin is $55,285 and $49,220 in right-to-work states, which is a significant gap that suggests wages are lower and poverty rates higher in the latter.
Right-to-work is a provision that allows a person to be employed in a private sector firm without having to belong to a union and follow the union’s rules, Barry Burden, University of Wisconsin political science professor said.
Wisconsin State AFL-CIO President Phil Neuenfeldt said right-to-work laws are the wrong step for Wisconsin and that he agrees with the study’s findings. He said Wisconsin’s manufacturing sector and economic organizations are geared toward high performance levels and do not need right-to-work laws to govern them. Moreover, he said the study also highlights the decline in wages and benefits in right-to-work states, reducing the public’s overall income.
“Right-to-work laws affect the general public because more downward pressure is put on wages and benefits as a result and then everybody’s wages and benefits go in the wrong direction, making it a general economic issue,” Neuenfeldt said. 
According to the study, the right-to-work laws have also negatively affected the status of other social aspects such as infant mortality rates, teen pregnancy rates and violent crime rates, amongst others. Violent crime rates, for instance, are 370.5 per 100,000 people in right-to-work states in comparison to 237 per 100,000 people in Wisconsin.
Neuenfeldt said the lower incomes in right-to-work states, demonstrated in the study, have negative implications for such aspects of society.
“You want to have a system that offers a hand up for people to get out of poverty so that many of those other statistics start to decline, instead of incline like they do in right-to-work states,” Neuenfeldt said.
However, Burden said there might have been other state-specific factors involved that could have affected these aspects as well, and that it is difficult to generalize it to just the right-to-work laws.
Burden said Wisconsin has higher average levels of education and income than Alabama, which is a right-to-work state. He said while it may be due to the fact it is a right-to-work state, it is likely because each state has different demographics.

6 comments:

  1. If there were an honesty in legislation law, "Right to work" laws would be more properly called "Right to work for a pittance" laws.

    ReplyDelete
  2. DAVOS ............ the Billionaire's UNION MEETING ...................... while the "Freedom to Work" JUDAS ISCARIOTS have been undermining the Worker's organizations,the BILLIONAIRES have become ever MORE organized. From the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Bilderbergers,DAVOS ..............they have tightened the noose around the neck of the Working Man.
    1) Doctors have UNIONS, one is the American Medical Association.
    2) Lawyers have UNIONS, one is the American Bar Association.
    3) ALL Professions have UNIONS ...... they have Trade Associations, They have Trade Publications
    Fraternities, Country Club Memberships .............
    P.S. YOU pay for THEIR Union Dues &Meetings.

    ReplyDelete
  3. how about "Right to SLAVE".

    ReplyDelete
  4. All the JUDAS ISCARIOTS who sell their fellow workers for pieces of silver never mention -Child labor - vacations - sick days - disability - safe working conditions - living wages -

    ReplyDelete
  5. The R-to-W Judas Iscariots also like to call it "Freedom TO Work" ....... sound familiar? ..... you remember ......... "Freedom THROUGH Work" over the gate at Auschwitz ..................

    ReplyDelete
  6. A study by the biased Economic Policy Institute? How about the number of jobs? Total bull.

    ReplyDelete