16 Nov 2014

Women in the 114th Congress are about to make history, and you’ll LOVE the reason why

Never believe for a second that the pro-life movement is a losing cause. The mainstream media will tell you it’s an outdated issue and that the only pro-life Americans are anti-women bigots stuck in the past. But now they can eat their words. A record number of pro-life women will be serving in 114th Congress.

The pro-life movement can be comforted to know that come this January there will be a record number of women representing them in Congress.
An historic 21 women who define themselves as pro-life will be serving in the 114th Congress, beating the previous high of 18. Marjorie Dannenfelser, the president of the pro-life Susan B. Anthony List, said that in 1992, when she started the SBA List, there were only two pro-life women in Congress. What a difference a few elections make.
The four new pro-life women joining the House of Representatives include Elise Stefanik (R-NY), Mia Love (R-UT), Barbara Comstock (R-VA) and Mimi Walters (R-CA). As for the Senate, it will gain pro-life fighter Joni Ernst (R-Iowa).
This new pro-life representation bodes well for legislation like the Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, a bill which would ban abortions after the fifth month of pregnancy. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has committed to introduce it for a vote once he becomes majority leader.
The influx of pro-lifers in Congress parallels the country’s shift on abortion. In May 2012, a record low of Americans (47 percent) defined themselves as “pro-choice” and millennials have been referred to as the pro-life generation, especially considering their passion at this year's March for Life in Washington, DC. One reason for this may be advances in technology, such as ultrasound machines, which allows us to peek into the womb and witness an unborn baby’s growth.

6 comments:

  1. I am 42 years old, and very much a PRO-LIFE voter.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Make sure to force these babies to be born...so you can cut off their CHIP, food stamps, welfare, etc... And then tell the to go to college and go into $100,000.00 debt...or become a soldier and fight for super wealthy elites but told they're "fighting for our freedom".

    Certainly, the woman's right to an abortion must be absolute in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy. And even in the third trimester, up to the time of birth, that right must be absolute, and the decision must be that of the woman in consultation with those medical personnel she chooses. Yes, a decision to abort late in pregnancy may be agonizingly difficult, just as it may be at an earlier time -- but whatever agony is involved is that of the woman, not a politician or bureaucrat who is unjustly empowered to make decisions that affect someone else on the most profound level. The responsibility and the consequences are the woman's, and no one else's. The choice is also hers, and no one else's.

    http://powerofnarrative.blogspot.com/2007/08/of-abortion-and-women-as-ultimate.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. You obviously carry your brains between your legs. How did you figure out how to use a computer?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Typical response from a brain dead yahoo, ever heard of ad hominem or its too complex for you?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wow, a psudoe intellectual who doesn't know when to keep his pants on. Nice to see some real men and women showed up at the polls and the Boxer-Feinstein-Pelosi cult of sluts forgot to rig a few elections around the country. You can't hide your immoral and racist crimes by butchering babies. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9w6QYPzF2TI

    ReplyDelete
  6. let this be the 114th time you've been told...

    The primary reason why the individual citizens of a country create a political structure is a subconscious wish or desire to perpetuate their own dependency relationship of childhood. Simply put, they want a human god to eliminate all risk from their life, pat them on the head, kiss their bruises, put a chicken on every dinner table, clothe their bodies, tuck them into bed at night, and tell them that everything will be alright when they wake up in the morning.

    This public demand is incredible, so the human god, the politician, meets incredibility with incredibility by promising the world and delivering nothing. So who is the bigger liar? the public? or the "godfather"?

    This public behavior is surrender born of fear, laziness, and expediency. It is the basis of the welfare state as a strategic weapon, useful against a disgusting public.

    - Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars

    ReplyDelete